<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMWorld 2009 recap: Cisco UCS, WAAS.. and more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://appgirl.net/blog/vmworld-2009-recap-cisco-ucs-waas-and-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://appgirl.net/blog/vmworld-2009-recap-cisco-ucs-waas-and-more/</link>
	<description>it&#039;s a wild wild web out there</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:50:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: appgirl</title>
		<link>http://appgirl.net/blog/vmworld-2009-recap-cisco-ucs-waas-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>appgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appgirl.net/blog/?p=176#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately I cannot comment on the remaining infrastructure. The video was produced by VMware / VMworldTV (http://www.youtube.com/user/VMworldTV). I&#039;d recommend reaching out to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately I cannot comment on the remaining infrastructure. The video was produced by VMware / VMworldTV (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/VMworldTV" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/user/VMworldTV</a>). I&#8217;d recommend reaching out to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josip Zmet</title>
		<link>http://appgirl.net/blog/vmworld-2009-recap-cisco-ucs-waas-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Josip Zmet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appgirl.net/blog/?p=176#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Great Video ... unfortunately I was not on vmworld2009 in SF ... can you please comment what happens with remaining 264 servers in 12 racks ... if Cisco provided 512 blades in 16 racks and production was running on 776 servers in 28 racks. I assume these where HP and/or Dell ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Video &#8230; unfortunately I was not on vmworld2009 in SF &#8230; can you please comment what happens with remaining 264 servers in 12 racks &#8230; if Cisco provided 512 blades in 16 racks and production was running on 776 servers in 28 racks. I assume these where HP and/or Dell ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

